I still remember the message that started it all: “Dude… They’ve claimed every single one of my videos.” My friend from uni had reached out in absolute panic after receiving 47 copyright strikes in a single morning – on content using my own music that I’d freely given him to use. Here’s where it gets properly mortifying: by later distributing that same track through a label’s Content ID system, I’d inadvertently transformed what we’d both assumed was safe background music into a copyright minefield. Every video he’d lovingly crafted over two years was suddenly flagged, monetisation suspended, channel teetering on the edge of termination. Months of his work hung in the balance because I hadn’t understood how Content ID’s retroactive tentacles could reach back through time and strangle previously legitimate uses.
Sound familiar? If you’ve ever stared at a copyright claim notification wondering how a 30-second clip of “safe” music could torpedo your entire channel, you’re not alone. After over a decade of providing Creative Commons music and fielding thousands of questions from bewildered creators, I’ve seen every conceivable licensing mishap – and most are entirely preventable.
I’m Shane Ivers of Silverman Sound Studios, and I’ve built my entire career around making music licensing simple for creators like you. With a Master’s in Music Composition and over 200 tracks that have soundtracked millions of YouTube videos, I’ve witnessed the evolution from the Wild West of early YouTube to today’s sophisticated (if sometimes overzealous) Content ID landscape. As such, all the examples below are referring to my tracks, but the rules apply to all CC licensed tracks.
This guide isn’t just another dry licensing explainer – it’s the culmination of a decade’s worth of real-world experience, creator feedback, and the lessons learned from watching talented people navigate this minefield. We’re going to cut through the confusion, bust the myths, and give you the tools to confidently choose, use, and credit music without losing sleep over copyright strikes.
Because frankly, you’ve got better things to do than decode legal jargon at 2 AM whilst panicking about whether your latest video might get flagged.
Let’s start by demolishing the biggest myth plaguing creators: Creative Commons is not copyright-free music. I cannot stress this enough. Every week, someone emails me saying they can use my tracks however they please because “it’s Creative Commons, so it’s free for anything, right?”
Wrong. Spectacularly, wonderfully wrong.
Creative Commons is a licensing system that works within copyright law, not outside it. Think of it as copyright with benefits – I retain full ownership of my music, but I’ve pre-approved certain uses under specific conditions. It’s rather like lending your car to a mate: you still own the vehicle, but you’ve agreed they can use it provided they follow certain rules (return it with fuel, don’t crash it into a tree, etc.).
The genius of Creative Commons lies in its standardisation. Instead of every artist creating bespoke licensing agreements – which would be about as efficient as reinventing the wheel for each bicycle – CC provides six standardised licenses that creators and users both understand. This prevents the legal equivalent of a game of Chinese whispers where “you can use this commercially” somehow becomes “you can sell it as your own composition.”
Here’s what Creative Commons IS:
Here’s what Creative Commons ISN’T:
The confusion often stems from comparing CC to traditional licensing, which typically involves complex negotiations, substantial fees, and enough legal paperwork to kill a small forest. CC feels so much simpler that people assume it must mean “anything goes.” Not quite – it’s just transparent about what’s allowed.
After years of explaining these licenses, I’ve developed what I call the “copyswingers hierarchy” – think of CC licenses like different levels of access to a private members’ club (or circles of hell), each with its own rules and privileges.
| License Type | Commercial Use | Modifications | Share Alike | Attribution | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC BY | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Required | Professional content creators |
| CC BY-SA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Required | ✓ Required | Open source projects |
| CC BY-NC | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Required | Personal projects |
| CC BY-ND | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✓ Required | Press releases, statements |
| CC BY-NC-SA | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Required | ✓ Required | Educational remixes |
| CC BY-NC-ND | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✓ Required | Preview only content |
This is the license I use for all my music, and it’s the most permissive in the CC family. With CC BY, you can:
The only catch? Give me credit. That’s it. One simple requirement in exchange for complete creative freedom.
Take my track “Spark of Inspiration” – it’s been used in everything from indie films to corporate training videos. The electronic-orchestral hybrid nature makes it perfect for creators who need something that feels epic but isn’t overpowering. Under CC BY, a YouTuber can use it as intro music, a film student can edit it for their short, and a marketing agency can include it in a client presentation – all perfectly legal with proper attribution.
ShareAlike introduces what the open-source community calls “copyleft” – any adaptations must be shared under the same license. It’s like a creative chain letter, but actually useful.
If I’d released “The Fall of Heroes” under CC BY-SA (I haven’t by the way), anyone creating a remix would need to license their remix as CC BY-SA too. This ensures the “openness” spreads rather than being absorbed into proprietary works.
ShareAlike works brilliantly for educational content and community projects, but it can complicate commercial ventures. If you’re creating content for a client who wants exclusive control over the final product, SA licenses might not play nicely with their requirements.
NonCommercial sounds straightforward until you try to define it. Personal YouTube channel with no ads? Clearly non-commercial. Monetised gaming stream? Obviously commercial. Educational video with affiliate links in the description? Now we’re in murkier waters.
The NC restriction isn’t my cup of tea for music because it creates too many grey areas. What happens when your non-commercial hobby channel suddenly takes off and you enable monetisation? Are historical videos retroactively in violation? The ambiguity causes more headaches than it prevents.
Combining NC and SA creates the most restrictive of the commonly used CC licenses. Perfect for academic collaborations and community resources, but decidedly awkward for most content creators who might eventually monetise their work.
NoDerivatives prohibits adaptations, which creates an interesting paradox for content creators. Using music as background in a video technically constitutes creating a derivative work – you’re combining the music with visual elements to create something new.
I’ve seen creators assume ND music is “safer” because it seems more restrictive, but it’s actually more likely to cause problems. If you can’t adapt the work, you can’t really use it as soundtrack music, which rather defeats the purpose for most creators.
The most restrictive CC license essentially allows only viewing and sharing in original form. Useful for some educational materials, but practically useless for content creators who need background music.
This trinity of terms causes more licensing confusion than any other aspect of music rights. Let me clear this up with what I call the “pizza analogy.”
Copyright-Free (Public Domain) is like finding a pizza recipe that no one owns – you can make it, sell it, modify it, or teach others to make it without asking permission or paying anyone. Classic compositions like Beethoven’s 9th Symphony fall into this category (though specific recordings don’t. Also Beethoven’s 9th would be the majestic Hawaiian pizza right?).
Royalty-Free is like buying a pizza-making license – you pay once upfront, then you can make as many pizzas as you want without additional payments. However, you still need to follow the license terms. You own the right to use the recipe, but not the recipe itself. This is how most stock music libraries work.
Creative Commons is like your grandmother sharing her secret pizza recipe with specific conditions – you can use it (even commercially with CC BY), but you must always credit where you got it. Grandma retains ownership, but she’s given you permission for specific uses. It’s the ricotta that makes it…
The crucial difference? Copyright-free means no one owns it, royalty-free means you’ve purchased usage rights, and Creative Commons means the owner has granted you specific permissions while retaining ownership.
I chose CC BY for my music because it provides the clarity of royalty-free licensing with the accessibility of public domain material. Creators get nearly complete freedom without the upfront costs, whilst I retain ownership and get credited for my work. Everyone wins – except perhaps my bank manager, who occasionally questions the business sense of giving away music that costs considerable time and money to produce.
After processing thousands of attribution queries, I can confidently say that 80% of “copyright strikes” on CC music stem from improper crediting rather than actual license violations. The good news? Proper attribution isn’t rocket science once you understand what platforms actually require.
| Platform | Description Field | Visual Credit | Clickable Links | Character Limit | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube | ✓ Yes | ○ Recommended | ✓ Yes | 5,000 | Easy |
| TikTok | ✓ Yes | ✗ Limited | ✗ No | 2,200 | Medium |
| ✓ Yes | ○ Stories only | ✗ Bio only | 2,200 | Hard | |
| Twitch | ✓ Panels | ✓ Overlay | ✓ Yes | Unlimited | Easy |
| Podcast | ✓ Show notes | ✓ Verbal | ✓ Yes | Varies | Easy |
| ✓ Yes | ○ Optional | ✓ Yes | 63,206 | Easy |
Before diving into platform specifics, let’s establish the universal framework for CC attribution. TASL stands for:
For my track “Lazy Daze”, proper basic attribution looks like this:
“Lazy Daze” by Shane Ivers (silvermansound.com) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
YouTube’s creator-friendly approach to CC music makes it the easiest platform for proper attribution – when you know the rules.
The Golden Rule: Attribution must appear in the video description AND be visible somewhere in the video itself when reasonable.
Perfect YouTube Attribution:
Music: "Overlander" by Shane Ivers Link: https://www.silvermansound.com/free-music/overlander Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
Pro tip: YouTube’s Audio Library includes an attribution generator for their CC tracks, but for music like mine that’s not in their library, you’ll need to create attribution manually.
Common YouTube Mistakes:
I recommend creating a standard template and including it in every video description, even if you’re not sure whether it’s legally required. Better to over-attribute than face a Content ID claim later.
TikTok’s approach to music attribution is delightfully paradoxical – simultaneously the most automated and the most complicated platform for CC music. Here’s the full picture:
When Your Music Lives in TikTok’s Library
If I’ve distributed my tracks through TikTok’s official channels (I have), the platform handles attribution with elegant automation. You simply:
This is attribution nirvana – completely automated, perfectly formatted, and actually beneficial for discovery since users can explore other content using the same track. It’s rather like having a butler who not only announces your arrival but ensures everyone knows where you got your brilliant soundtrack.
The Pre-Edited Video Conundrum
Here’s where things get properly interesting. When you upload a video edited outside TikTok (in Premiere, Final Cut, or even CapCut):
Manual Attribution Fallback
For CC music not distributed to TikTok’s library (which includes most of my catalogue at time of writing), you’re back to manual attribution:
♪ "Monsieur Miaow" by Shane Ivers
⚡ CC BY 4.0 | silvermansound.comThe character limit means brevity is essential. Some creators use their bio link to host complete attribution, adding “Music credits in bio” to their descriptions.
The Business Account Wrinkle
Business accounts operate under different rules entirely:
Pro Strategy for TikTok Success
I recommend a belt-and-braces approach:
The peculiar genius of TikTok’s system is that when music IS in their library, attribution becomes a discovery mechanism rather than a legal burden. Users clicking through to the sound page find hundreds of creative interpretations of the same track, turning compliance into community. It’s rather like copyright law accidentally creating a social network.
Future-Proofing Your TikTok Strategy
Since TikTok’s music library constantly evolves, a track unavailable today might appear tomorrow. Keep a master list of tracks you use regularly and periodically check if they’ve been added to TikTok’s library. When they appear, you can retroactively add the official sound to your existing videos, improving both attribution and discoverability.
The platform’s rapid evolution means today’s manual workaround might be tomorrow’s automated feature. Until then, we navigate this peculiar middle ground where a 15-second video might require more attribution strategy than a feature film.
Instagram’s approach to music attribution resembles an elaborate dance where you’re perpetually working around the platform’s curious aversion to external links. It’s rather like hosting a dinner party where you can’t actually tell guests your address – you just have to hope they find the note you’ve tucked behind the garden gnome.
The Reels Revolution
Instagram Reels fundamentally changed the attribution game, borrowing TikTok’s playbook whilst adding characteristic Meta complications:
When Using Instagram’s Music Library:
The External Edit Dilemma
When uploading pre-edited content (the preference of any creator who values precise timing):
The Link Problem
Instagram’s most infuriating limitation remains its steadfast refusal to allow clickable links in post descriptions. Your carefully crafted attribution:
Music: "Neon Noir" by Shane Ivers
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
Source: silvermansound.com/free-music/digital-sunriseSits there looking lovely but functionally inert, like a beautifully painted door that doesn’t actually open.
Creative Workarounds That Actually Work
The Link Tree Strategy:
The Story Attribution Method:
The Visual Attribution Approach:
Business Accounts and Original Audio
Instagram Business accounts face their own labyrinth:
Pro Instagram Attribution Template
For posts and Reels:
[Your content description]
.
.
🎵 "Neon Noir" by Shane Ivers
📜 CC BY 4.0 | Details in bio linkFor Stories:
♪ Shane Ivers - "Neon Noir"
Creative Commons BY 4.0
Swipe up for track link (if available)The Unspoken Instagram Reality
Here’s what nobody tells you: Instagram’s algorithm seems to favour content using tracks from their official library. Using external audio might impact reach, but using properly attributed CC music keeps you legally protected whilst maintaining creative control. It’s choosing artistic integrity over algorithmic approval – rather like choosing to paint with oils when everyone else has switched to digital.
Twitch occupies a peculiar space in the attribution landscape – it’s simultaneously the most creator-friendly platform and the most technically demanding for proper music crediting. Like conducting an orchestra whilst explaining music theory to the audience, live streaming requires real-time attribution strategies that don’t disrupt the performance.
The DMCA Thundercloud
After Twitch’s 2020 DMCA apocalypse (where thousands of streamers watched years of VODs vanish overnight), the platform’s relationship with music became… complicated. CC music emerged as a life raft in these turbulent waters, but attribution requirements didn’t simply disappear – they evolved.
Real-Time Attribution Solutions
The Overlay Method (Most Professional):
Example overlay format:
♫ Now Playing: "Play The Game"
Shane Ivers | CC BY 4.0The Chat Bot Symphony: Set up Nightbot or StreamElements with commands:
!song – Returns current track with attribution!playlist – Links to complete music credits!license – Explains CC licensing to curious viewersThe Panel Approach: Create a dedicated panel below your stream:
🎵 STREAM MUSIC 🎵
All music by Shane Ivers
Licensed under CC BY 4.0
[Track List & Credits]
silvermansound.comVOD Considerations
The complexity multiplies when your live content becomes permanent:
The Subscription Notification Quirk
Many streamers use CC music for alerts:
Each requires attribution, but flooding your stream with credits would be absurd. Solution: Create an “Alert Sounds” panel listing all audio used for notifications with proper attribution.
Category-Specific Strategies
Gaming Streams:
Just Chatting/IRL:
Creative/Music Streams:
The Multi-Platform Export Challenge
When your Twitch content migrates to other platforms:
Advanced Twitch Attribution Setup
// Streamlabs Chatbot Custom Command Example
!addcommand !music Multi Currently vibing to music by Shane Ivers
(silvermansound.com) - All tracks CC BY 4.0 licensed.
Full playlist: [your-website]/stream-musicThe Hidden Benefit
Properly attributed CC music on Twitch creates an unexpected advantage: community trust. Viewers appreciate transparency, and clear attribution demonstrates professionalism. It’s rather like showing your work in mathematics – the process becomes part of the performance, transforming legal obligation into community education.
Video Projects: Include attribution in end credits, opening credits (for theme music), and always in descriptions.
Games: Attribution screens are standard – most players expect to see music credits alongside other development credits.
Presentations: Include a slide with music credits, typically near the end or in appendix materials.
Physical Products: Copyright notices page for printed materials, liner notes for audio releases.
In my decade of providing CC music, I’ve seen creators make the same avoidable mistakes repeatedly. Here are the big ones, along with how to sidestep them entirely.
Music: "[Track Name]" by Shane Ivers
Link: https://www.silvermansound.com/free-music/[track-url]
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Many creators discover CC music, properly attribute it once, then assume they’re covered forever. The problem? They forget about attribution when they:
The Fix: Create an attribution checklist. Every time you publish content with CC music, verify the attribution is present and correct on that specific platform.
I regularly see creators properly credit full tracks but forget to update attribution when they edit music. If you cut “Two Guns, One Destiny” down from its full 4:00 runtime to a 30-second intro comprising of the beginning and end edited together, you’ve created an adaptation. Whilst this is perfectly allowed under CC BY, you should note the modification.
Better Attribution for Edited Content:
“Intro music adapted from ‘Two Guns, One Destiny’ by Shane Ivers (silvermansound.com), licensed under CC BY 4.0”
Some creators credit the platform where they found the music rather than the original source. I’ve seen attributions to “YouTube Audio Library” or “Free Music Archive” instead of the actual composer. Whilst these platforms deserve recognition for hosting content, they’re not the copyright holders.
Always Credit the Creator: If you found my music on Free Stock Music, credit me (Shane Ivers) as the creator whilst optionally mentioning FSM as the source.
This is a dangerous misconception. Content ID registration is separate from copyright ownership. Many CC tracks aren’t registered in Content ID systems to avoid complications, but this doesn’t waive attribution requirements.
Just because you don’t get a Content ID claim doesn’t mean you can skip crediting the music. The license requirements remain the same regardless of automated detection.
“Music by various Creative Commons artists” isn’t proper attribution. Each track needs individual credit with specific details. I understand this can be cumbersome for videos using multiple tracks, but there’s no shortcut that satisfies legal requirements.
For Multi-Track Projects: Create a dedicated credits section listing each track individually, or maintain a credits page on your website and reference it in video descriptions.
Platform algorithms and user behaviour patterns affect where attribution should be placed. Burying credits at the end of a 45-minute video where most viewers won’t see them isn’t ideal. Similarly, placing attribution only in expandable description text that requires clicking “show more” reduces visibility.
Optimal Placement Strategy:
Some creators assume fair use provisions allow them to skip attribution for CC music used in educational or review content. This misunderstands both fair use and Creative Commons licensing.
Fair use is a defence against copyright infringement – but CC music isn’t about copyright infringement at all. It’s about following license terms. Attribution is required regardless of fair use considerations because you’ve chosen to use the CC license rather than claiming fair use.
People often ask why I “give away” music that takes considerable time, skill, and money to produce. The question implies I’m somehow harming my business, which couldn’t be further from the truth.
The decision to use CC BY 4.0 for my music library wasn’t altruistic – it was strategic. When I launched Silverman Sound Studios in 2013, the music licensing landscape was dominated by expensive stock music libraries and complex sync licensing deals that priced out emerging creators. YouTube was exploding with creative talent who needed quality music but couldn’t afford traditional licensing fees.
I saw an opportunity to build a sustainable business model around accessibility rather than exclusivity. Instead of selling individual licenses for £100+ per track to a limited market, I could provide free music with attribution and monetise through volume, support, and premium options.
Here’s how it actually works:
Every properly credited use of my music creates brand awareness. When someone includes “Music by Shane Ivers (silvermansound.com)” in their video description, they’re essentially providing free advertising to my target market – other content creators. This organic discovery method has proven far more effective than traditional music marketing channels. Consider my track “Happy Clappy Ukulele”. It’s been used in thousands of videos, generating millions of impressions for my brand. Each use potentially introduces my music to viewers who might become creators themselves, perpetuating the cycle.
CC music serves as the top of my sales funnel. Creators discover my work through free tracks, experience the quality, then often upgrade to Pro Licenses for projects where attribution isn’t practical or desired. The Pro License isn’t just about removing attribution requirements – it includes:
About 15% of creators who regularly use my CC music eventually purchase Pro Licenses, making the business model surprisingly robust.
Creative Commons creates a sense of collaboration rather than transaction. When creators use my music, they’re joining a community of people who value accessible, high-quality resources. This community effect generates loyalty that traditional licensing rarely achieves. I regularly receive messages from creators sharing how they’ve built their channels using my music, or thanking me for making their projects possible. These relationships have led to collaboration opportunities, custom commission work, and a network of creative professionals who recommend my services.
Music licensing is ultimately about relationships and reputation. By making my work accessible and demonstrating trust in the creative community, I’ve built a brand that stands out in a crowded marketplace. Traditional exclusive licensing might generate higher per-track revenue, but CC licensing generates higher lifetime value through diversified income streams: direct track sales, subscription services (my Patreon), custom composition work, and consultation services.
I chose the most permissive CC license because restrictions create friction, and friction kills adoption. CC BY removes virtually all barriers to use whilst maintaining the attribution requirement that drives discovery. More restrictive licenses like NC or ND might seem safer, but they create confusion and reduce usage. A track that’s used less frequently provides less exposure and generates fewer opportunities. By maximising usage through minimal restrictions, CC BY creates a virtuous cycle of exposure and opportunity.
After years of helping creators navigate music licensing, I’ve identified several strategies that separate confident, successful creators from those constantly worried about copyright issues.
Create a Master Attribution File: Maintain a spreadsheet with every CC track you’ve used, including:
This becomes invaluable when platform policies change or when you need to verify historical usage.
Develop Signature Sounds: Instead of randomly selecting music for each project, identify 10-15 tracks that work with your content style and use them consistently. This creates audio branding whilst simplifying attribution management.
For example, if you create tech review videos, you might use tracks from my Electronic Collection as consistent intro/outro music, creating audio recognition among your audience.
YouTube Optimization: Use the same CC tracks across multiple videos to establish audio consistency. YouTube’s algorithm seems to favour channels with recognisable audio patterns. My track “Wallpaper Paste” was specifically composed for this purpose – it’s designed to be unobtrusive background music for vlogs and tutorials.
TikTok Timing: TikTok’s algorithm favours videos that use trending audio, but CC music gives you an edge for original content. Select tracks from my TikTok Music Collection that complement TikTok’s short-form format.
Podcast Consistency: Establish consistent intro/outro music using the same CC tracks across episodes. This creates brand recognition whilst simplifying attribution (you can include standard attribution in your show notes template).
| Step | Action | Timeline | Success Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Claim Received | Don't panic - check attribution | Immediate | N/A |
| 2. Verify License | Confirm track is CC licensed | 5 minutes | N/A |
| 3. File Dispute | Select "I have a license" | 10 minutes | 95% |
| 4. Provide Evidence | Include attribution & source link | Within 24 hours | 98% |
| 5. Wait for Response | Typically resolved automatically | 1-5 days | 99% |
| 6. Appeal if Needed | Contact creator directly | 7-14 days | 100% |
Understand the System: Content ID claims aren’t copyright strikes. They’re algorithmic matches that can usually be resolved through YouTube’s dispute system if you have proper attribution.
Prepare for False Claims: Even properly licensed CC music sometimes generates Content ID claims when third parties fraudulently register tracks they don’t own. Keep attribution documentation readily available.
Use Frequency Music Protection: I’ve registered my tracks with Frequency Music to protect both my rights and legitimate users. If you receive a Content ID claim on properly attributed music from my catalogue, the dispute process should resolve quickly.
Remix and Adapt Freely: CC BY allows creating adaptations, so experiment with:
Cross-Platform Consistency: Use the same CC tracks across YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and podcast versions of content to maintain brand coherence whilst simplifying attribution management.
Seasonal Scheduling: Plan music selection around content calendars. For holiday content, browse collections by mood rather than genre to find tracks that enhance seasonal themes.
Engage with Composers: Many CC music creators (myself included) appreciate hearing how our music gets used. Sharing finished projects can lead to collaboration opportunities and early access to new releases.
Community Participation: Join creator communities focused on music licensing and CC resources. The knowledge sharing in these groups often prevents costly mistakes.
Attribution as Marketing: View proper attribution not as a legal requirement but as a networking opportunity. Good attribution practices build relationships with music creators who might offer early access to new releases or custom work.
Audio Quality Management: Download the highest quality versions available. My Pro Licenses include uncompressed WAV files, but even the MP3 versions are encoded at high bitrates for professional use.
File Organisation: Create a local library organised by mood, tempo, and genre. Include attribution information in file metadata to prevent confusion later.
Backup Strategies: Maintain local copies of all CC music you use regularly. Whilst my tracks aren’t going anywhere, having local access prevents project delays if internet access is limited.
Over the years, I’ve received thousands of questions about Creative Commons music licensing. Here are the most common queries with practical answers.
Absolutely. CC BY 4.0 explicitly allows commercial use, which includes YouTube monetisation. Just include proper attribution in your video description. I specifically chose CC BY precisely so creators could build businesses using my music without additional licensing fees.
The only caveat: ensure your attribution is complete and visible. YouTube’s Content ID system occasionally flags CC music if attribution appears incomplete to their algorithms.
Don’t panic. CC 4.0 includes a 30-day “cure period” – if you correct attribution within 30 days of discovering the omission, your license rights are automatically restored. However, this assumes the omission was unintentional.
The practical solution: Add proper attribution immediately upon discovering the problem. In my experience, most CC music creators prefer polite communication over legal action when attribution issues arise.
Yes, with proper attribution. The CC BY license allows you to create work for third parties (clients) as long as attribution requirements are met. However, some clients prefer music where attribution isn’t required – for those situations, consider a Pro License.
Pro Licenses include written documentation that clearly establishes usage rights for client work, which many professional creators find worthwhile for the peace of mind alone.
Not under CC BY 4.0. Commercial and non-commercial uses are treated identically – both require attribution, both are fully permitted. This differs from CC BY-NC licenses, where the commercial/non-commercial distinction becomes crucial (and often confusing).
Absolutely. CC BY allows adaptations, which includes editing, remixing, and incorporating tracks into larger works. Using my music as background in your video technically constitutes creating an adaptation, which is perfectly allowed.
Best practice: Note significant modifications in your attribution. For minor edits (trimming, volume adjustment), this isn’t necessary, but if you’ve substantially altered the track, mentioning the changes prevents confusion.
This occasionally happens when third parties fraudulently claim ownership of CC music. The solution is YouTube’s dispute process:
I’ve registered my music with Frequency Music partly to prevent these false claims, but they still occasionally slip through.
Yes, but ensure attribution appears on each platform where the content is published. If TikTok automatically reposts your video to Instagram, verify that attribution information carries over.
The license follows the content, not the platform – you need proper attribution everywhere the music appears.
CC licenses are irrevocable for the duration of copyright protection. Once I’ve released music under CC BY 4.0, I cannot retroactively change the license or revoke permission for existing uses. Your usage rights continue as long as you comply with attribution requirements.
However, I could theoretically release future music under different licenses – the CC license applies to specific works, not to all of an artist’s output forever.
CC BY 4.0 gives you the same usage rights as a Pro License with one key difference: attribution requirements. Pro Licenses remove the attribution requirement and add several conveniences:
For many creators, the attribution requirement isn’t burdensome, making CC licenses perfectly adequate. Pro Licenses are primarily for professional situations where attribution isn’t practical or desired.
This gets complicated quickly. While CC BY allows adaptations, releasing entire CC tracks on streaming platforms as your own work would violate both the license terms and platform policies.
However, sampling, remixing, or incorporating CC music into original compositions is generally allowed with proper attribution. If you’re planning commercial music releases incorporating my work, I’d recommend discussing specific usage to ensure compliance.
CC licenses don’t depend on the Creative Commons organisation continuing to exist. The licenses are legal instruments that remain valid even if CC disappeared tomorrow. However, the practical infrastructure (license deed websites, etc.) might become more difficult to navigate.
This is one reason I maintain detailed licensing information on my own website rather than relying entirely on CC infrastructure.
Absolutely. Translation doesn’t affect music licensing – the music usage remains the same regardless of language changes to other content elements. Just maintain proper attribution in whatever language you’re using.
No usage limits under CC BY 4.0. You could theoretically use my entire catalogue in a single project as long as each track receives proper attribution. Practically speaking, most projects use 1-3 tracks to avoid overwhelming the audience or cluttering attribution.
For creators who regularly use multiple tracks, I offer a complete catalogue download that includes over 200 tracks with batch attribution formatting.
Music licensing doesn’t have to be the creative roadblock it’s become for so many creators. Creative Commons, particularly CC BY 4.0, offers a path forward that benefits everyone involved – creators get high-quality music without financial barriers, composers get exposure and attribution for their work, and audiences get better content.
The key is understanding that CC isn’t “free music” – it’s freely licensed music. The distinction matters because it emphasises the relationship between creator and user, the importance of proper attribution, and the mutual respect that makes the system sustainable.
After a decade of providing CC music and watching the creator economy evolve, I’m more convinced than ever that accessible, high-quality resources paired with proper education create better outcomes than restrictive licensing models. By understanding these principles and following the practical guidelines in this guide, you can confidently use Creative Commons music to enhance your creative work whilst supporting the composers who make it possible.
Now stop worrying about copyright claims and get back to creating brilliant content. The world needs whatever unique perspective you’re bringing to it – and it needs a good soundtrack too.
For more resources, track downloads, and updates on music licensing, visit silvermansound.com. If this guide helped solve your licensing challenges, proper attribution for the advice would be rather nice too.
This guide represents a decade of practical experience in Creative Commons music licensing. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, licensing requirements can vary by jurisdiction and platform. When in doubt, err on the side of comprehensive attribution – it’s rather like saying “please” and “thank you”: never wrong, always appreciated.
So here I aim to gather all of the totally free music resources in one list. For a site to make the list, it must offer tracks that are not only free to use but also cleared for commercial purposes. No strings attached, no hidden costs.
There’s some important changes to the way crediting works on YouTube.
Basically, you must now add credits to the video description.
This only applies to users of the Creative Commons license option. Read on for more detail…
Hey there! So you’re looking for music for your project, and you’ve probably seen terms like “royalty-free”, “copyright-free”, and “Creative Commons” being thrown around everywhere. Let’s clear up what these actually mean, because – spoiler alert – they’re not the same thing!
Wow, you made it here? It seems that you like what you hear! Fancy receiving some musical goodness directly into your mailbox?
⭐ Quick Donation
Even $1 helps keep the music flowing. (No account needed)
🎵 Get More Music
Join Patreon for perks like unlimited Pro Licenses
📧 Never Miss a Track
Get new music in your inbox every time I release new music